The Essential Literacy Publications, Research and Resources

Still working my way through the Disciplinary Literacy book by Thomasina Piercy and William Piercy.  On page 19 of their book, they provide a list of key literacy publications, research and resources that I intend to work my way through and keep at my fingertips for continuous reference.  They include:

  • Changing Literacy for Changing Times by Hoffman and Goodman, 2009, Routledge
  • Common Core State Standards.  National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010, www.corestandards.org
  • Rigorous Curriculum Design. Ainsworth, 2010, Lead + Learn Press
  • “About the Elementary and Secondary Education Act”. Dennis, 2009, State of Washington, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, www.k12.wa.us/esea
  • Five Minds for the Future.  Gardner, 2008, Harvard Business School Press
  • Leading Change in your School.  Reeves, 2009, ASCD
  • “New Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Overbaugh and Schultz, 209, www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Bloom/blooms_taxonomy.htm
  • Outliers: The Story of Success and What the Dog Saw. Gladwell, 2008 and 2009, Brown and Company
  • Visual Tools for Transforming Information into Knowledge.  Hyerle, 209, Corwin Press
  • “P-21 Framework Outcomes – Interdisciplinary Themes for Core Subjects”.  Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2009, www.21stcenturyskills.org/
  • Schooling by Design.  Wiggins and McTighe, 2007, ASCD
  • “Standards for the Assessment of Reading and Writing 21st Century Literacies”. National Council of Teachers of English, 2009, www.ncte.org/standards/assessmentstandards
  • “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents”.  Shanahan and Shanahan, 2008, Harvard Educational Review
  • “The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators (2009)”.  ISTE, 2009, www.iste.org/NETS/ (click on “NETS for Administrators 2009″)
  • Time to Act: An Agenda for Advancing Adolescent Literacy for College and Career Success.  Carnegie Corporation.  Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy, 2010, www.carnegie.org/literacy, Cavanaugh Press

 

The Essential Citizen Journalist. Ideas for Authentic Student Work

I am making my way through an interesting book titled, Disciplinary Literacy. Redefining deep understanding and leadership for 21st century demands.  Authors Thomasina Piercy and William Piercy relate a variety of ideas to engage students in rigorous, relevant and authentic work that easily meet both ELA and Math Common Core Standards.  The main idea is to provide ample opportunity for students to assume an identity and then learn how to read, write, speak, view, listen and think through the lens of that identity, e.g. read like a mathematician, write and think like a scientist, report like an historian.

In this particular blog, I want to focus on a foundational identity the authors state all students need to learn to assume, that is as Citizen Journalists.  No matter what you teach (math, science, social studies, ELA) or kind of student you teach (ESE, Gifted, ELL) you can easily engage your students in the Citizen Journalist process outlined below while simultaneously aligning your efforts to a key edict of the Common Core standards; every teacher is responsible for teaching literacy skills.

Ultimately the big idea of employing a literacy strategy such as Citizen Journalist, is to engage students in authentic work that starts with students choosing an event or story of interest to research and then finally publish their own thinking on the topic.  The concept of citizen journalism stems from a current 21st century phenomena where regular people, not in the journalism trade, can access real time raw data and report on it.  This raw data is essentially unfiltered by reporters, textbook companies, television reports, newspapers, parents, teachers, friends, etc.  One resource for this type of unfiltered raw data can be found at whitehouse.gov, an iPhone application where regular folks can access real time events as they unfold with virtually no filtered information with the report.  Of course, we can also access filtered information from the White House on current and past events related to domestic and global happenings.

Organizing students into small groups, you need to first model the whole process from end to end.  Together, your class should choose a compelling reported event or story from the White House app or the news.  You can instantly see that for a science teacher, students could look for science related articles, and so on and so forth for other content specific teachers.  You need to provide your students with at least a triangulation of unfiltered and filtered complex text.  Again, complex text can include raw unfiltered reported events as they happen and filtered text such as news and stories already reported on an event via the Internet and video.  Expand your mind in terms of what you think text is.  There’s print text from blogs, magazines and newspapers but text can also be delivered via video and radio addresses.  Notice textbooks aren’t even mentioned in this assignment, however, they can and still do, serve as useful resources for students as they dig deeper into their topics.  Another source, which will also be a place you can have students post their culminating work, is a site specifically designed for Citizen Journalists, CNN’s www.cnn.com/mobile/iphone/.

Obviously you will need access to the Internet, a way to project information and or let the students either access content through school supplied computers and Internet access or allow them to utilize their own smartphones to access the Internet and grab content.  They will also ultimately need to post their articles in a digital format.  In the mean time, you can print out articles on the chosen topic and project videos and audio files from the front of the room.  Either way, students need access to a variety of text.

Next, the class breaks down their research of these text genres or types into three literacy actions:

  1. Evaluating and analyzing
  2. Questioning unfiltered and filtered information
  3. And distributing information to others through blogs and CNN’s www.cnn.com/mobile/iphone/

Students begin the process by questioning and ultimately answering the context of each type of text and its source (evaluating and analyzing).  Don’t assume any of your students know how to do this.  It’s a process you will need to take the lead on with consistent modeling and provision of multiple opportunities for guided practice.  This process will also require your consistent follow through with multiple checks for understanding as you invite students to think, talk, read, listen, view and write to answer these questions first with you, then in small groups, and then finally slowly release them to work as individuals.

We begin with evaluating and analyzing our triangulation of complex text, which remember, can include video and audio clips:

  • Who is providing the information and how is that source connected to the topic?
  • Can this source be trusted?  Why or why not?
  • What does this source have to gain by providing this view of the information?
  • In what way does this information, provided “by the people” accurately inform me or not?

Next, students question filtered and unfiltered information by asking:

  • What claims or ideas in the information must be fact-checked for accuracy?
  • Is this a primary document or has it been recycled by others?  Explain how.
  • Does this information create a dilemma for me or others?  If so explain why and how.
  • How does this new information connect with me and my prior information?

And finally, students synthesize their research and prepare an authentic project to distribute their new thinking and information to others in the form of a blog or posting an article on CNN’s site designed specifically for Citizen Journalists at www.cnn.com/mobile/iphone/ after considering and answering the following questions :

  • What is my responsibility in reporting this information?
  • Will my voice be perceived as reliable?
  • How will my reporting contribute to interdependent or other peoples’ understanding?
  • What medium will best communicate this information with clarity to the public?
  • What will be the possible impact or results of our reporting?

I look forward to hearing from those of you who try this strategy with your students.  It’s a rigorous activity that brings in current and relevant topics pertaining to any subject you teach.  It invites and requires all of your students to engage in all areas of literacy. To consume information they read, listen, and view.  To produce new thinking they write for specific audiences and publish that thinking through authentic engaging 21st century means.  And most importantly they must take a stand, take a position, assume an identity, produce new knowledge, argue for and justify their thinking on relevant and meaningful topics.

 

 

 

The ESSENTIAL ROUND ROBIN READING: THE WORST READING STRATEGY IN THE WORLD

Recently, Hal W. Lanse, Ph.D, author of Read Well, Think Well: Build your Child’s Reading, Comprehension and Critical Thinking Skills, wrote a blog post titled, Round Robin Reading, The Worst Reading Strategy in the World.  Lanse’s blog post has gotten much attention as I recently listened to my peers as they related that Round Robin is now shunned as a strategy.  I get that Round Robin Reading is a bad strategy but I want to make sure that we make the distinction between Round Robin Reading and Round Robin related cooperative learning structures.

According to Lanse one of the worst reading strategies in the world and one of the most common is round robin reading.  Basically the strategy works like this: the class will open a book and the teacher will ask a student to read aloud. Invariably the student will read a page, stumbling over many words as the teacher supplies the correct pronunciation, which further embarrasses the student and makes him or her want to crawl into a hole.  The rest of the class is bored silly and or is diligently reading ahead so they don’t look foolish when it comes time for them to read.  My daughter often comes home from school complaining about her teachers’ frequent use of this strategy, relating that audible groans can be heard from the hallways as her peers are forced to endure this practice.  And worse yet, having ELL students read while the teacher provides constant corrections of pronunciation is totally counterproductive.

But, let’s not confuse Round Robin Reading with Round Robin Brainstorming and other Kagan Cooperative Learning related Round Robin structures.  In a Round Robin Brainstorming structure the class is typically is divided into small groups (4 to 6) with one person appointed as the recorder. A question is posed with many answers and students are given time to think about answers. After the “think time,” members of the team share responses with one another round robin style. The recorder writes down the answers of the group members. The person next to the recorder starts and each person in the group, in order, gives an answer until time is called.  Round Robin, in general, means that each person in a small group is given time to process and think about content, write about it, talk about it with his or her peers, listen to his or her peers talk it through, provide each other feedback on their thinking, and create new knowledge from the experience.  In my book (or blog) this strategy is really hard to knock.

If, however, you are looking for specific productive reading strategies, Lanse suggests the following:

GUIDED READING: Teachers and peers model comprehension strategies by giving a child a book to read and then assessing how well he/she is using the strategy. Predicting is one such strategy. Adults can use a model reading passage to demonstrate how they use characters’ words and actions to predict what will happen later in the story.

SHARED READING: The teacher reads aloud as students follow in their own texts. Periodically, the teacher “thinks aloud” how he/she interprets the text. For example, the teacher can demonstrate how to interpret a characters’ feelings by saying, “The hero said (fill in the blank) or did the following (fill in the blank) so know I know he must be feeling (fill in the blank).” Later, young readers can try the same type of comprehension strategy in texts of their own.

ECHO READING: The teacher reads a short passage, demonstrating how he/she uses punctuation marks as cues to modulate his voice. Students then build their fluency skills by reading aloud the same passage.

As always, thanks for reading, and I look forward to your thoughts and feedback.  C