The Essential Literacy Publications, Research and Resources

Still working my way through the Disciplinary Literacy book by Thomasina Piercy and William Piercy.  On page 19 of their book, they provide a list of key literacy publications, research and resources that I intend to work my way through and keep at my fingertips for continuous reference.  They include:

  • Changing Literacy for Changing Times by Hoffman and Goodman, 2009, Routledge
  • Common Core State Standards.  National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010, www.corestandards.org
  • Rigorous Curriculum Design. Ainsworth, 2010, Lead + Learn Press
  • “About the Elementary and Secondary Education Act”. Dennis, 2009, State of Washington, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, www.k12.wa.us/esea
  • Five Minds for the Future.  Gardner, 2008, Harvard Business School Press
  • Leading Change in your School.  Reeves, 2009, ASCD
  • “New Bloom’s Taxonomy”. Overbaugh and Schultz, 209, www.odu.edu/educ/roverbau/Bloom/blooms_taxonomy.htm
  • Outliers: The Story of Success and What the Dog Saw. Gladwell, 2008 and 2009, Brown and Company
  • Visual Tools for Transforming Information into Knowledge.  Hyerle, 209, Corwin Press
  • “P-21 Framework Outcomes – Interdisciplinary Themes for Core Subjects”.  Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2009, www.21stcenturyskills.org/
  • Schooling by Design.  Wiggins and McTighe, 2007, ASCD
  • “Standards for the Assessment of Reading and Writing 21st Century Literacies”. National Council of Teachers of English, 2009, www.ncte.org/standards/assessmentstandards
  • “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents”.  Shanahan and Shanahan, 2008, Harvard Educational Review
  • “The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators (2009)”.  ISTE, 2009, www.iste.org/NETS/ (click on “NETS for Administrators 2009″)
  • Time to Act: An Agenda for Advancing Adolescent Literacy for College and Career Success.  Carnegie Corporation.  Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy, 2010, www.carnegie.org/literacy, Cavanaugh Press

 

The Essential Citizen Journalist. Ideas for Authentic Student Work

I am making my way through an interesting book titled, Disciplinary Literacy. Redefining deep understanding and leadership for 21st century demands.  Authors Thomasina Piercy and William Piercy relate a variety of ideas to engage students in rigorous, relevant and authentic work that easily meet both ELA and Math Common Core Standards.  The main idea is to provide ample opportunity for students to assume an identity and then learn how to read, write, speak, view, listen and think through the lens of that identity, e.g. read like a mathematician, write and think like a scientist, report like an historian.

In this particular blog, I want to focus on a foundational identity the authors state all students need to learn to assume, that is as Citizen Journalists.  No matter what you teach (math, science, social studies, ELA) or kind of student you teach (ESE, Gifted, ELL) you can easily engage your students in the Citizen Journalist process outlined below while simultaneously aligning your efforts to a key edict of the Common Core standards; every teacher is responsible for teaching literacy skills.

Ultimately the big idea of employing a literacy strategy such as Citizen Journalist, is to engage students in authentic work that starts with students choosing an event or story of interest to research and then finally publish their own thinking on the topic.  The concept of citizen journalism stems from a current 21st century phenomena where regular people, not in the journalism trade, can access real time raw data and report on it.  This raw data is essentially unfiltered by reporters, textbook companies, television reports, newspapers, parents, teachers, friends, etc.  One resource for this type of unfiltered raw data can be found at whitehouse.gov, an iPhone application where regular folks can access real time events as they unfold with virtually no filtered information with the report.  Of course, we can also access filtered information from the White House on current and past events related to domestic and global happenings.

Organizing students into small groups, you need to first model the whole process from end to end.  Together, your class should choose a compelling reported event or story from the White House app or the news.  You can instantly see that for a science teacher, students could look for science related articles, and so on and so forth for other content specific teachers.  You need to provide your students with at least a triangulation of unfiltered and filtered complex text.  Again, complex text can include raw unfiltered reported events as they happen and filtered text such as news and stories already reported on an event via the Internet and video.  Expand your mind in terms of what you think text is.  There’s print text from blogs, magazines and newspapers but text can also be delivered via video and radio addresses.  Notice textbooks aren’t even mentioned in this assignment, however, they can and still do, serve as useful resources for students as they dig deeper into their topics.  Another source, which will also be a place you can have students post their culminating work, is a site specifically designed for Citizen Journalists, CNN’s www.cnn.com/mobile/iphone/.

Obviously you will need access to the Internet, a way to project information and or let the students either access content through school supplied computers and Internet access or allow them to utilize their own smartphones to access the Internet and grab content.  They will also ultimately need to post their articles in a digital format.  In the mean time, you can print out articles on the chosen topic and project videos and audio files from the front of the room.  Either way, students need access to a variety of text.

Next, the class breaks down their research of these text genres or types into three literacy actions:

  1. Evaluating and analyzing
  2. Questioning unfiltered and filtered information
  3. And distributing information to others through blogs and CNN’s www.cnn.com/mobile/iphone/

Students begin the process by questioning and ultimately answering the context of each type of text and its source (evaluating and analyzing).  Don’t assume any of your students know how to do this.  It’s a process you will need to take the lead on with consistent modeling and provision of multiple opportunities for guided practice.  This process will also require your consistent follow through with multiple checks for understanding as you invite students to think, talk, read, listen, view and write to answer these questions first with you, then in small groups, and then finally slowly release them to work as individuals.

We begin with evaluating and analyzing our triangulation of complex text, which remember, can include video and audio clips:

  • Who is providing the information and how is that source connected to the topic?
  • Can this source be trusted?  Why or why not?
  • What does this source have to gain by providing this view of the information?
  • In what way does this information, provided “by the people” accurately inform me or not?

Next, students question filtered and unfiltered information by asking:

  • What claims or ideas in the information must be fact-checked for accuracy?
  • Is this a primary document or has it been recycled by others?  Explain how.
  • Does this information create a dilemma for me or others?  If so explain why and how.
  • How does this new information connect with me and my prior information?

And finally, students synthesize their research and prepare an authentic project to distribute their new thinking and information to others in the form of a blog or posting an article on CNN’s site designed specifically for Citizen Journalists at www.cnn.com/mobile/iphone/ after considering and answering the following questions :

  • What is my responsibility in reporting this information?
  • Will my voice be perceived as reliable?
  • How will my reporting contribute to interdependent or other peoples’ understanding?
  • What medium will best communicate this information with clarity to the public?
  • What will be the possible impact or results of our reporting?

I look forward to hearing from those of you who try this strategy with your students.  It’s a rigorous activity that brings in current and relevant topics pertaining to any subject you teach.  It invites and requires all of your students to engage in all areas of literacy. To consume information they read, listen, and view.  To produce new thinking they write for specific audiences and publish that thinking through authentic engaging 21st century means.  And most importantly they must take a stand, take a position, assume an identity, produce new knowledge, argue for and justify their thinking on relevant and meaningful topics.

 

 

 

The Essential: Lesson Study Simplified

In this month’s Tool’s for Schools (Learning Forward, Summer 2011 Vol. 14, No.4), Anthony Armstrong shares an elegant and simple system to conduct Lesson Studies.  The system was designed by the Development Studies Center.  The Lesson Study cycle consists of three phases: Plan the Lesson; Observe the Lesson; and Analyze the Data and Discuss the Lesson.

Phase One: Plan the Lesson

In this phase a teacher leader and her team watch a DVD about lesson study and read an article about the concept’s origins, which happens to be Japan.  I assume that the Developmental Studies Center offers resources of this nature at www.devstu.org.  Once the stage or background knowledge foundation has set, the group then looks at a pre-prepared lesson so that the group can focus on observations and analysis.  Using a Lesson Planning Form, the lesson study group decides for every teacher action, what are the observable measurable behaviors they might observe by the students.  And, how might a teacher respond to anticipated student behaviors.  How will the teacher intervene?  By predicting and anticipating behaviors, the group discussed and shared solutions before the lesson even began!

Phase Two: Observe the Lesson

Using a rubric, the teachers then observe the lesson in a classroom setting.  The Teacher Leaders sticks her neck out and delivers the lesson.  But, the group doesn’t focus their attentions on observing the teacher.  Instead, they focus all their attentions on the learning.  And, they do not interact with the students.  Using three simple observation tools, the team splits up observation responsibilities into three sub-categories:

  • Word-for-Word record 1: What does the teacher ask?  The recorder is examining the types of questions teachers can ask and how they affect student engagement and learning.  Each time the teacher asks a question, record the exact questions and time.
  • Word-for-Word record 2: How do the students respond?  Each time the teacher asks a questions, record the time and exactly what the students say in response.  In order to do this two observers may have to work together to make a connection between the question asked and then how the students responded to make sense of it all.  I suggest video taping the lesson to make sure observations are accurate.
  • Time sweep: Who’s talking and when?  Who begins speaking? What time? What are the number of minutes or seconds the speaker(s) talked?  Why do this?  To measure how much time the teacher and students spend talking to explore what the time spent talking tells the group about the lesson and how it affects student learning.

Phase Three: Analyze the Data and Discuss the Lesson.  This is where the rubber meets the road.  Less focused on the teacher, the group focuses entirely on what resonated with the students and what parts of the lesson didn’t.  The teachers seek to understand how the students made sense of the materials and what each student’s reactions revealed about that student as a learner.  Time sweeps allow the group to understand whether there’s a sage on the stage or whether the students are clearly doing the work.

The final exercise is for the Teacher Leader to journal their thoughts while the observers write on sticky notes what they thought went well, what could change and how it applies to changing their individual behaviors going forward.

The next step is for another group member to present a lesson.  Using a lesson framework such as Hunter’s 7 steps (anticipatory hook… etc.) or the 5E Model, the group would design a lesson together and then move to phases two and three.

Imagine if PLCs conducted a Lesson Study each quarter and video-taped the process?  That would go a long way to building a school or district based video library of solid slices of instructional behaviors for others to observe and learn from.  Fantastic stuff.  Do we really need to purchase expensive packaged Lesson Study kits when at the core, this process is clearly not rocket science?  I think not.

Does this simple and beautiful model of Lesson Study meet Domain I Standards?  I’d say yes to all the below observable measurable behaviors articulated below.

  • Utilizes group processes to help colleagues work collaboratively to solve problems, make decisions, manage conflict, and promote meaningful change;
  • Models effective skills in listening, presenting ideas, leading discussions, clarifying, mediating, and identifying the needs of self and others in order to advance shared goals and professional learning;
  • Employs facilitation skills to create trust among colleagues, develop collective wisdom, build ownership and action that supports student learning;
  • Strives to create an inclusive culture where diverse perspectives are welcomed in addressing challenges; and
  • Uses knowledge and understanding of different backgrounds, elasticities, cultures, and languages to promote effective interactions among colleagues.